| HALEK HOSSAIN |
|---|
| Rohingya News |
| Malaysia |
| Bangladesh |
| Tech Videos |
| Mega Menu |
| Love Story |
| Hot Story |
| Image |
| Videos |
| Logo |
Reading this post will answer the following important questions.
Who was on the right of Maula Ali and Amir Muawiyah?
Why is Amir Muawiyah's practice so much nowadays? But never before have so many virtues of Amir Muawiyah been mentioned?
Is it right to convict Amir Muawiyah for Yazid's heinous crime?
Why only Amir Muawiyah without describing the dignity of 124,000 Companions?
Did Imam Hasan leave the caliphate in the hands of a traitor?
Nowadays, wherever Ali is discussed, what is the need for Muawiyah's discussion?
There is no dispute about the dignity of Mawla Ali Sher Khuda (RA) and we do not consider those who dispute as Sunnis. Just as there is no dispute about the rising of the sun in the east, so there is no dispute about the dignity of Asadullah Ghalib.
Who was on the right of Maula Ali and Amir Muawiyah?
Mawla Ali was always above Haqq and his dignity was very high. However, Amir Muawiyah was on the Ijtihadi record (not a sin).
All the companions of Rasulullah ï·º are in Paradise.
For Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): "They are better in rank than those who have spent and struggled later. But Allaah has promised good to all. And Allaah is All-Aware of what you do." (Surah Hadid 10)
"Allah is pleased with them (the Companions) and they are pleased with Allah." (Surah Bayyinah 6). Imagine for a second you were transposed into the karmic driven world of Earl.
Rasulullah ï·º Ershad said - "Do not call any of my companions evil. Even if one of you gives gold like the mountain of Uhud, it cannot be equal to giving a quarter of their barley; It can't be even half that. ” [Bukhari: 1st volume - 518 pages, Tirmidhi: 2nd volume - 225 pages]
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Fear Allaah concerning my Companions, and do not make them the target of reproach and ridicule. He who loves my companions loves them in my love, and he who hates them hates them because he hates me. " [Tirmidhi Sharif, 2nd-225]
Rasool Kareem Raufur Rahim, the messenger of the future, prayed for Amir Mu'awiyah (R): “O Allah! Make him a guide and a guide, and guide him to the right path. "(Tirmidhi 3642)
Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) addressed Amir Mu'awiyah (may Allah be pleased with him) as a jurist and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) forbade him to say anything because of his companionship. (Sahih Bukhari 364, 365)
Therefore, keeping in view the above verses and hadiths, the law that the Ahl as-Sunnah has followed for 1400 years is to consider the Ahl al-Bayt and the Companions above criticism. Only their dignity and value will be stated, no one should dare to criticize them. Blasphemy is a far cry, because it is a sign of the dog of hell.
At the same time, according to the scholars, we must always remain silent about the differences of opinion of the Companions.
Why is Amir Muawiyah's practice so much nowadays? But never before so much practice about him?
The identity of the Shiites is that they, along with Kholafaye Rashedin Umm al-Mu'minin, make the most heinous remarks about Katibe Ohi Jalil and Mu'awiyah, the Companions of the Paradise of Qadr. Ahlus Sunnah has been strictly suppressing this fitna in the ulama for thousands of years and will continue to do so in sha Allah.
The problem, however, is that nowadays some Sunni disguised saints are selling their faith in the name of Iran and trying to spread Shiaism in the Ahlus Sunnah. This has never happened before in the history of Ahlus Sunnah in the last 1400 years, so there has never been so much discussion about this before. Shiaism began with the blasphemy of Amir Mu'awiyah, then Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Umm al-Mu'minin Ayesha. In this case, these Sunni disguised Shia Kathmollas widely propagated and disseminated the fake hadiths narrated by the Shias and insulted the Emir Muawiyah in such a heinous manner that the blood of his feet would rise to his head.
Therefore, all the Haqqani ulama of the Indian subcontinent have agreed that since this fitna is misleading the society, in order to save the common people from that misguidance, the ulama will repeatedly preach and will continue to preach Mu'awiyah. As long as Ameer Muawiyah's insults do not stop, Allah will continue to discuss this Companion of His Habib with a vile person like me In sha Allah.
Why only Amir Muawiyah without describing the dignity of 124,000 Companions?
Because the honor of other Companions is not being insulted in this age, so there is less discussion about them. If the dignity of other Companions is insulted, the dignity and value of that Companion will always be discussed In sha Allah.
Is it right to convince Amir Muawiyah for Yazid's crime?
It is true that Yazid was a lustful, tyrant, transgressor, drunkard. Even Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal has issued a fatwa calling Yazid a disbeliever, but Imam Azam has remained silent on the matter. But is the father ever punishable for the son's crime? Has God made such a law? No, not spelled. Therefore, the blame for Yazid's crime can never be placed on the shoulders of Amir Muawiyah.
Did Imam Hasan leave the caliphate in the hands of a believer (Naujubillah)?
Narrated from Abu Bakrah. (He said) I heard the Messenger of Allah (saw) say on the pulpit, Hasan (R) was by his side at that time. He once looked at the people present and then at Hasan (R) and said, "This child (grandson) of mine is Sayyid (Sardar)." Through him, Allah will reconcile the two disputing groups of Muslims. (Sahih Bukhari 3648, 3629, 2604)
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) himself for for whom he prayed, for whom he gave the certificate of faith, to whom Imam Hasan (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) handed over power. Has Imam Hasan R transferred power to an incompetent person? Then it will also become a slander in the name of Imam Hasan. Goodbye!
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): "O you who believe! Do not take the lead before Allaah and His Messenger, and fear Allaah. Verily, Allaah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing." (Surat al-Hujurat: 1)
Imam Hasan handed over power to Amir Mu'awiyah as he was a believer. On the other hand, because Yazid was an incompetent sinner, Imam Husain accepted the martyrdom of 72 members of his family but did not accept the power of the sinful Yazid.
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) had warned the Ummah long ago that some people would go astray in the name of love of the Ahl al-Bayt. Regarding the Shia preachers in the name of love of Ahl al-Bayt, the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: "O Ali! Your likeness is like that of Jesus (peace be upon him). One group will go astray by exaggerating your love, the other group will go astray by hating you. " (Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hamble, Volume 1, Page No-160; Fazail Sahaba, Imam Ahmad Ibn Hambal, Volume 2, Page No-639, Hadith No-106)
Wherever Ali r is discussed, why Muawiyah r is discussed?
When the ulama describe the virtues of Shabe Barat, they also point out the misguidance of the Kathmollas who call Shabe Barat bidayat. When Ashura is discussed, Imam Husain is discussed and the Ummah is informed about the heinous activities of Yazid. When it comes to Jesus, there is talk of Christians who have gone astray
Thus, when Mawla Ali and the Ahl al-Bayt are discussed, the Haqqani ulama, in order to protect the faith of the people, warn them that Ali's love does not mean insulting or abusing Amir Muawiyah or any other Companion. It is the practice of the Ahl as-Sunnah to describe the dignity of the Ahl al-Bayt with respect to all the Companions.
After all, there is a need to discuss this in a new way or why? Where the famous Tabein, the greatest Imams of the age have written books on this subject and answered all the erroneous questions in this regard. No one in Ahl-e-Sunnat can argue about the fact that Imam Ahmad Raza Khan himself has written five books, big and small, and dug the grave of Shiaism.
Imam Ahl-e-Sunnat Ala Hazrat said: Mawla Ali is the crown of our head, Amir Mu'awiyah and all the Companions are our chiefs and Amir Muawiyah is the dog of hell who hates Mu'awiyah.
Finally, I will ask the ignorant people who have gone astray after reading the books of Shiites
Rasulullah ï·º Amir Muawiyah did not pray for?
Amir Muawiyah R was not a revelation?
Didn't Imam Hasan hand over power to him thinking he was a believer?
Didn't the Imams of Sihah Sitta, including Imam Bukhari, narrate the hadith narrated by Amir Muawiyah? Didn't they write Radhiyallahu Ta'ala Anhu after writing Muawiyah?
Did not Islamic rule spread during his tenure?
May Allah protect our faith from the new fitna in the last days. (Amin)
No comments:
Post a Comment